Friday, 26 February 2016

'Ali Muhammad Bab

0


'Ali Muhammad Shirazi was born at Shiraz in 1235/1819. His father, Mirza Riqa, died when he was a child, and thereafter 'Ali Muhammad grew up under the care of his maternal uncle, Sayyid 'Ali. 
After his elementary education in Persian and Arabic, a capital which he strenuously applied later to the production of his 'tablets' and 'revelations'  with awful results, he went to Bushehr, where - despite his poor ability in arithmetic - until the age of 20 he helped his uncle in his trade.
There, he spent his leisurely hours studying religious books and in zealous ascetic and devotional exercises. His early eccentric character is depicted by the story that he would offer daytime prayers on the roof, staying for hours in the intense summer heat of the scorching Persian Gulf sun.
 
In the year 1255/1839, he went to Karbala' and joined the circle of Sayyid Kazim Rashti, which he attended, according to his own statement, for at least a year. When Sayyid Kazim died in 1259/1843, 'Ali Muhammad, apparently simultaneously with the other claimants, declared himself to be the successor of Sayyid Kazim, a claim which brought him into conflict with the other claimants - all disciples of the Shaykh and Sayyid Kazim and their respective supporters. On 8th Jamadl al-'Awwal1260/1844, six months after Sayyid Kazim's death, he declared himself to be the bab (lit, gate; another term for al-rukn al-riibi'v or the intermediary of the Twelfth Imam. Having confided his claim privately to his sympathizers from among the followers of Sayyid Kcq:im in Shiraz, he proceeded to Hajj the same year, probably with the intent of launching his venture from Makkah. However, changing his mind, he returned to Basrah from where he reportedly wrote to his supporters in Shiraz to publicly annouce his 'babhood' in Shiraz. This announcement, in the course of a prayer call by a follower, caused a stir in the city, and consequently the Bab was summoned to Shiraz by the governor, Nizam al-Dawleh.
 
At Shiraz, on interrogation, he broke down and recanted his claims; but  he was confined to prison. According to Talhhis-e ta'rihh-e Nabil Zarandi, a Baha'i pseudo-history, (which in addition to the highly doubtful character of the authenticity of its ascription to its purported author, liberally mixes fiction with facts depending more on fancy than memory or written records), the Bab made a public denial of entertaining any extravagant claims on a Friday in the Masjid-e Wakil of Shiraz. This was in 1261/1845.
 
While the Bab was in confinement at Shiraz, the governor of Isfahan, Maniichehr Khan Gurji Mu'tamad al-Dawleh, an Armenian Christian, had him transferred secretly to Isfahan, where the Bab stayed as a guest at his residence. Maniichehr Khan was a Russian protege who under Russian patronage had been installed into the governorship of Isfahan, an important province. 

Foreign powers, mainly Britain and Russia, wielded a strong influence over the country's politics throughout most of the Qachar period. The provincial governorship served as a channel for foreign interference in the affairs of Iran. In addition, the foreign legations ardently cultivated the loyalty of religious minorities (some of which were created by colonial support, like the Babis), which also served as a very effective channel of influence over the affairs and life of the country. The following quotation from The English Amongst the Persians by Denis Wright, who was British Ambassador to Iran for 8 years (1963-71), throws some light on this sad state of affairs:

(Besides the 'professional Anglophils') ... there was another class of British proteges, created by Anglo-Russian rivalry and both countries' efforts, when they considered their interests threatened, to make sure that provincial governorships were in friendly hands. To this end the British, like the Russians, did not hesitate to bring pressure on the Persian authorities, though such interference in internal affairs was greatly resented. In 1899 Durand was able to report to the Foreign Office that 'in the south we have greatly strengthened our position by insisting upon, and obtaining, the removal of an obnoxious Governor of Bushire.' (P.R.O. FO/416/1. Durand to Salisbary, 12 February 1899). 
In 1903 the British Minister protested against the threatened removal from office of the Governor of Sistan in whose support the Government of India were even prepared to occupy Nusratabad (now Zabol). As a result of a secret agreement made with the Bakhtiari khans before World War I the British Government undertook to help secure the appointment of Bakhtiari candidates to certain governorships. In Persian eyes such governors were little more than British puppets.
 
From time to time the oppressed and persecuted religious minorities -Zoroastrians, Jews, Nestorians, Armenians and Bahais - would seek the protection of the British Legation or Consulates. Sometimes the British, who in those days were inclined to regard themselves as the keepers of the world's.conscience, would take up the cudgels, embarrassing though it was to intervene on the behalf of Persian subjects.

Maniichehr Khan Mu'tamad al-Dawleh (lit. the Trustee of the Government!) was such a Russian stooge. An official Baha'i 'history' reports the following episode that passed between Maniichehr Khan and the Bab:
 
One day Mu'tamad al-Dawleh was in the garden in the Blessed Presence (i.e. with the Bib). He said, "God has bestowed upon me much wealth and I don't  know for what purpose I should spend it. I have reflected upon it, and if you permit me I will spend my riches for assisting your cause .... 1 will urge Muhammad Shah (the Qachiir king), and I am certain that he will become a believer and undertake to propagate your faith in the world's east and west. Then I will persuade him to remove Haji Mirza Aghas (Prime Minister), who is a treacherous person and a scourge for the kingdom. I will also arrange your marriage with one of the Shah's sisters .... I will invite the world's rulers to this blessed and dear faith .... I will wipe away this obnoxious group (i.e. the Shl'Is), who are a disgrace for Islam, from the face of the World." The Bab replied,
 
"You have good intentions .... ,,8
 
In any case, Maniichehr Khan's protection allowed the Bab to carry on his evil mission from Isfahan through his adherents, who were mostly followers of Absa'i and 8ayyid Kazim. The Bab kept on instigating them through letters-for which he had a fanciful name, alwtil] (tablets).
 
On the complaints of the 'ulama' of Isfahan to the Prime Minister, and following the death of Manuchehr Khan, the Bab was shifted, via Tehran, to Azarbaijan, in northwest Iran, where he was held in lenient imprisonment (as shown by his ability to freely correspond with his dti'is and to write his 'revelations' in the form of his incomplete al- Bay tin) first at Miikii, from Sha'ban 1263 to Jamadl I 1264/July 1847 to April 1848, and then at Chehriq until his execution in Sha'ban 1266/ June-July 1850.
 
The Bab's writings as well as those of Babi and Baha'i authors confirm beyond doubt that until the year 1264/1847, before his transfer to Chehriq, 'All Muhammad believed in all the Twelve Imams (A), claim'ing himself to be the biib of the Twelfth Imam in occultation, al-Hujjat ibn al-Hasan al-'Askari (A).9 
Thereafter his claims underwent a radical change as he subsequently claimed to be the Twelfth Imam himself, the promised Mahdi and the Qa'im. Not satisfied with claiming to be the Qa'im, he proceeded to claim prophethood and even divinity.' 0
 
Following his claim to prophethood, he rejected the doctrine of the ultimacy (khiitamiyyah) of the prophethood of the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.a) and suggested a theory of resurrection (qiyiimah) similar to the doctrine of the Isma'ill al-Hasan al-Sabbah. Accordingly, he claimed that the Bab's appearance ended the era of the applicability of the Islamic Shari'ah. Also, the Islamic doctrine about the Day of Resurrection was claimed to be a misconception. Rather, the mission of Jesus (A) was the 'qiyiimah' of Moses (A) and his ummah. The ministry of the Holy Prophet (S) was the 'qiyiimah' of Jesus (A) and the Christian community. The appearance of the Bab signified the 'qiyiimah ' of -the Prophet Muhammad (S) and his ummah, In the same way as the Bab's teaching brought to an end the era of the Islamic Shari'ah, his book, ol-Bayan, abrogated the Qur'an. He promised the appearance of another prophet who will appear, he claimed, after 1511 or 2001 (in accordance with the numerical sum of the letters of ~I [or.;;..~ ] or ~ ; the reason for the uncertainty being lack of arithmetical rigour, and there is no scarcity of such instances of indifference to arithmetical and historical facts in the writings of the Bab and Baha').
 
The Bab was a gifted calligrapher, although his writings are abun- dantly replete with errors of grammar and syntax, which show his meagre education. 'I'he Bab's 'revelations,' recorded in al-Bayiin and hisalwiiQ, came mostly in awful Arabic. Although he defended his 'scripture' by proclaiming that his emancipating ministry had liberated words and sentences from the yoke of grammar and syntax, no educated man was convinced. It is probably on account of the poor literary skills of the Bab and Baha' that they could not make any adherents among Arabs). 

At Tabriz, he was interrogated by some Shaykhi scholars in the presence of Nasir al-Din Shah, Crown Prince at the time. During the interrogation - of which three separate reports have been quoted by the author - 'Ali Muhammad showed his dire ignorance of not only the elements of Arabic grammar and simple rules of Islamic law, but disclosed also an amazing ignorance of the very basics of arithmetic. Asked to explain his own statement:

And know that when you find any booty, then, verily, for Dhikr (i.e. the Bab himself) is one-third
 The Bab replied that in his authority as the Qa'im he had the right to receive half of the one-fifth (khums), which is the Imam's Share (sahm- e Imam) according to the Shi'i legal school. The Bab had imagined that 1/3 made a rough half of 1/5! His other non-arithmetical replies were of a similar order. Consequently, he broke down at the end of the inter- view, pleading pity, repenting and recanting all his claims. The following is the text of the Bab's recantation (tawbehniimeh), the facsimile of  whose original in the Bab's own hand (first published by E.G. Browne in his Material for Study of the Biibi Religion) which appears in the present book:

May my soul be made your ransom. Praise be to God as He deserves to be praised, the manifestations of Whose grace and mercy encompass all the creatures, in all conditions. Praise be to God Who made that Personage (Crown Prince) the spring of kindness and mercy, who by manifesting his magnanimity has benignly afforded forgiveness to his servants, concealing the misdeeds of the offenders and showing pity to the rebellious. I call upon God, and those who are with Him (the angels), to witness that this feeble servant has no intentions opposed to the good pleasure of the God of Islam and His Awliya', although my whole being is sheer sin.

But since I have heartfelt belief in the unity of God Almighty and the prophethood of the Messenger of Allah - may God's benedictions be upon him and his progeny - and the Awliya ' (i.e. the Imams), and since my tongue confesses to the truth of whatever God has revealed, I put my hope in His mercy. I have absolutely had no intentions opposed to His good pleasure, and if anything opposed to His good pleasure has come forth from my pen, my intent was not rebellion. In any case, I am repentant in front of Him, and this servant has absolutely no knowledge so as to justify any kind of claim. I implore God's forgiveness and I turn to Him. Some of the prayers and words that have emerged on my tongue do not signify any kind of claim. I consider any claim to the specific deputyship (niycibat-e khassah) of the Hujjat Allah (the Twelfth Imam) - upon whom be peace - as a false one, and this slave has not made such a claim, nor any other claim of the kind. I implore the grace of the 'King of kings' (Muhammad Shah)and that Personage (Crown Prince) to forgive this supplicant with their magnanimity, kindness and mercy. wa al-salam.

 Despite this recantation, the Bab did not relent in his ambitions, and he continued to contact his supporters - who campaigned for him in Iranian cities - calling them to pave the way for his release and triumph.
The result was the ugly incidents of Qazwin, Bedasht, Barfunish, Qaleh-ye Shaykh Tabrasi, Nayriz, and Zanjan, the last three of which were armed rebellions encouraged by the failing health and later the death of Muhammad Shah, Nasir al-Din Shah's father, and the general chaotic conditions of the country.
Mulla Muhammad Taqi, the first to do the tahfir of Shaykh Ahsa'i, was murdered in Qazwin by a Babi, Mirza Salih Shirazi, at the behest of Qurrat al-'Ayn (a mother of three children who had left her husband), with whom he had madly fallen in love, although he was not her only lover. A scandalous incident was created at Bedasht by Qurrat al-'Ayn and her companions. Armed rebellions were staged at Qaleh-ye Shaykh Tabrasi (in Mazandaran), Nayriz and Zanjan, in which Mulla Husayn-e Bushrir'i (called 'Sayyid 'Ali A'zam,' and posthumously 'Husayn-e Mazlum'), Mulla Ali Barfurushi (alias 'Quddus'), YaJ)ya Darabi, and Mulla Muhammad 'Ali Zanjani (alias 'Hujjat") played leading roles. The author cites evidence and instances of the interference of the British and Russian legations in regard to the bloody uprising staged by the Babis in Zanjan, which indicate the great interest and sympathy with which the foreign powers followed the activities of the Babi adventurers and terrorists.
 
It was to the good fortune of the Islamic country of Iran that a highly able and determined prime minister such as Mirza Muhammad Taqi Khan Amir Kabir was at the helm of state power during those sensitive years of mid-nineteenth century. With great determination he put down the Babi terror and moved resolutely to take the decisive step of the Bab's execution. Amir Kabir earned the bitter hostility of the Russians and the British for his services to the country, and he finally paid for his vigilance and undaunted independence with the loss of prime ministership and soon later of his immensely precious life.
 
The Bab's execution broke the Babi messianic hopes and frustrated the ambition of wrenching power from the ruling Qachaars.
Although the Bab had taken care to designate a successor, Mirza Yahya Nuri, the so-called Subh-e Azal and Hadrat-e Thamrah, the movement would have completely fizzled out had. it not been for the Ottoman protection afforded to the Baha'is and the gang of Mirza Husayn 'Ali Nuri, who had already named himself Baha', for he could hardly contain himself when he saw his fellows receiving such titles as 'Aqdas' and 'Hujjat' from the self-styled 'Bab.'






Sayyid Kazim Rashti

0


The circle of disciples created by Ahsa'i was maintained and extended by his successor Sayyid Kazim Rashtl (1212-1259/1797-1843) ..
According to Muhammad Karim Khan Kirmani (1225-1288/1810-1871), the Shaykhi leader, in Hidiiyat al-talibin (p.71), Ahsa'i made this announcement to his pupils about Rashti: "Take your instruction ('ilm)  from Sayyid Kazim, because he has acquired knowledge from me and I  have learnt from my Imams. (Rather), he has received instruction directly from God." Sayyid Kazim was at most 30 years when the Shaykh died (in 1241 or 1242H/l825 or 1826). Younger and inferior to others  among Ahsa'i's pupils in learning, he was designated by the Shaykh as  the most proper person to carry on his teachings and propagate his doctrines. Sayyid Kazim also taught that the Twelfth Imam (A), believed  by the Twelver Shi'is to live in this world in concealment, existed in the  world of harqiiliyah . He added that the Imam's return will not be in his  physical frame; rather, the Twelfth Imam would return to rule the world  and fill it with justice by incarnating himself in one of the disciples of  the Shaykh and Sayyid Kazim. With his failing health, he told his dis-  ciples that "the appearance of the Imam is near and the person in whom the Imam would be incarnated might be present among you."
This led his disciples to think that he himself was the Twelfth Imam  incarnate. For about 17 years after the Shaykh, Sayyid Kil?im kept  alive the circle of Ahsd'I, developing further adherents from Arabs and .  Persians and functioning in the professed role of ol-rukn al-riibi' and  intermediary between the Twelfth Imam and the community of believers. He did not return to Iran during this period.
Sayyid Kazim, far inferior to his predecessor in learning, is nevertheless the author of some works, such as Sharl; qasidah, Dalil al-mutah-ayyirin, al-Hujjat al-biilighah, Sharl:z Ayat al-Kursi and ai-Rasa 'il, the last being a collection of his letters and short treatises. In Shorb qasidah, which is an exposition of parts of the eulogy of an Arab poet, 'Abd al- Baqi Afandi, written to eulogize an Ottoman governor of Iraq, Sayyid Kazim expounds the following couplet, which alludes to the Prophet's famous tradition about 'AIi ibn Abi TaIib (A)


    I am the city of knowledge and 'Ali is its gateway
 

This is the bazaar of the city of knowledge,
One who does not enter whose gate is lost.
Therein, Sayyid Kazim imagines 'the city of knowledge' as a celestial  city inhabited by the Imams, and with an unenviable zest for the  grotesque goes on to describe its streets and lanes. One of the lanes  belongs to a man with a dagger in his hand called Rakhibah; others  belong to, or are given the names of, Shamshalak, Tiithasha, Tuti'al,  Suqtim Sahsuyilah ; Deh Darreh, Arhutah, Latunasidah, Samlsur,  Turtirush, Kashifl'Iyil, Khiyar Shirrish, Tala Liiriyah.i. and similar  incredible names. With the exception of 'Ali Muhammad Bab, perhaps,  no author has ever dived into the depth of imaginative absurdity to the extent of Sayyid Kazim Rashti (not even Salvador Dali, the surrealist  painter, with his grotesque 'masterpiece', The Art of Farting, comes any  near to the accomplishments of this Sayyid from Rasht!). His works  disclose the character and calibre of the disciples that had faithfully gathered around him. There is reason to believe that aside from his  degenerate imagination and inborn talent for the grotesque, the hallucinatory states induced by such drugs as hashish, bhang and marijuana had much role to play in the lively absurdities conjured up by him.
 
Nevertheless, Sayyid Kazim and his followers enjoyed the patronage and support of Ottoman authorities who saw the political potential of this strange group of Persian heretics, in their manoeuvres against the Persian regime of the Qachars and as a counterweight to the Shi'i religious  leadership based in Najaf and Karbala'i!
 
It is not certain whether Sayyid Kazim designated any successor. After his death in 1259/1843, a number of his disciples, including his son Sayyid Ahmad, claimed to be his successors. Three prominent  claimants to Sayyid Kazim's successorship were: Muhammad Karim  Khan Kirmani, the leader of the Shaykhis based in Kerman, Mirza .  Shafi' of Tabriz, and Mirza 'Ali Muhammad, the would-be Bab, in  Shiraz.

 

Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i

0


The Shaykh was born near al-'~sa', in the region of al-Qa~if, in  northern Arabian peninsula. As a child he was contemplative and given  to solitude. In 1186/1772, at the age of 20, he proceeded to the holy  cities of Iraq for further studies. There at the age of 43 (in 1209/1794),  he acquired ijiizahs for narrating hadith from such illustrious scholars of  the time as Sayyid Mahdi Bahr al-Ulum (d.1212/1797), Shaykh Ja'far  Kashif al-Ghita' (d. 1227/1812) and Sayyid 'Ali Tabataba'i (123111815).
The ijiizahs (cited in the book) commend his piety, learning and intelligence. Following the outbreak of plague in Iraq, he returned home,  staying in Bahrayn for 4 years. Thereafter he went for pilgrimage to the  holy cities of Iraq and returned to live at Basrah and its neighboring  villages and towns from 1213/1798 to 122111806. Thereafter, during a  journey to Mashhad, he received a warm welcome at Yazd, where he decided to settle down. While at Yazd he was wooed by the Qachar king,  Fath 'Ali Shah, who invited him to Tehran. The book records some of  their correspondence as well as an account of his days at Tehran. On his  way to Iraq, he stayed for 2 years at Kermanshah, urged by the patronizing crown prince, Muhammad 'Ali Mirza, to whom he is said to have given a written guarantee to paradise in return for a thousand tumans,  with which the Shaykh paid off his debts. In 1232/1817 he went to  Makkah and returned by the way of Najaf and Karbala' to Kerrnanshah  in 1234/1818. It was in 1236/1820 that while stopping at Qazwin, on  his way to Mashhad, the Shaykh was first denounced as a heretic  by Mulla Muhammad Taqi. This led to his disrepute in the theological circles of Najaf, Karbala', Qumm, Mashhad and Isfahan, As a result,  during this journey the Shaykh did not see any of the former reception at Tehran, Yazd or Isfahan. He returned to Kermanshah, and when  after a year he went to Iraq he was faced with the bitter opposition of  the 'ulama' for his unconventional doctrines. In 1241/1825, the Shaykh's  remarks in his Sharl; al-Ziyarat al-jiimi'ah ; offensive to Sunnis, gave the  Ottoman governor of Iraq, Dawud Pasha, the pretext to despatch a  force, which attacked Karbala' pillaging and massacring its people. The  Shaykh, who was in Iraq at the time, fled to Makkah, dying on the way  near Madinah, where he was buried.
His other works include a Sharl; on the Masha'ir of Mulla Sadra  (1230), 'Ismah wa raj'ah (1231), Shari; on Mulla Sadra's 'Arshiyyah  (1236), Risiileh-ye Rashtiyyah, Risalat l].ayiU al-nafs, Jauiiimi' al-kalim, Risalat Mulla Muhammad ra.hir, Sharl; ol-Fauia'id; Kashkitl, Risiilah  musta'mal, and other treatises on fiqh, kalam, divination and numerology.     .
The background, if not the seeds of al-Ahsa'i's doctrines, lies in  Akhbarism, of which he was a foll~r in fiqh, despite the fact that  Akhbarism was on decline after WatIid Behbahanl (d. 1206/1791) in  the theological schools of Iraq and Iran. Akhbarism, with its rejection  of rationalism and its unscrupulous reliance on hadith, opens the way  for the doctrinal incursions by cja5f (weak) traditions and the narrations  of the ghuliit, The susceptibility to ghali doctrines is shown by the belief  of the Shaykh and his followers that the Imams (A) were manifestations  of Divinity imazhar ilahi) and possessed Divine attributes. Another  factor was Ahsa'I's strong disposition towards Isma'Ili and Sufi teachings, which is evident in the formulations of the Shaykh and his disciples.
Absa'i also seems to have assimilated some ideas of the Sabaeans during  his residence at Basrah and its vicinity. His term, if not the conception,  of harqitliyah - a term hitherto unfamiliar in Islamic philosophy and  mysticism - for a quasi-immaterial sphere, carne from the Sabaeans. It  was in the world of harqitliyah, according to Ahsa'l, that the Twelfth Imam (A) dwelt, not in the physical world. al-Ahsa'i conceives of man as  possessing a 'harquliyan' body in addition to his physical frame. While  the physical body decays irretrievably at death, the harqiiliyan body  survives, and it is with it that the soul shall arise on the Day of Resurrection. Ahsa'i, accordingly, denied physical resurrection and it was on this count that he was condemned as heretical by the Shi'i theologians  of Iraq and Iran. The Shaykh also denied that the Prophet (S) undertook his celestial nightly journey (mi'raj) bodily; the ascent was spiritual, according to him.
The Shaykh rejected the criteria developed by Islamic scholars for  ascertaining the reliability of traditions, claiming that he was capable of  "smelling out" the verity of ahadlth. He claimed to meet the Imams (A)  regularly in his dreams, and from them he claimed to receive instruction  as well as frequent clarification to his doubts, According to Mirza Muhammad Tunekabunl, the author of Qi~~ al- 'ulamii' and a junior  contemporary of AJ;tsa'i, the Shaykh used to say, "The very (content of  the) hadith by itself makes me certain that it is the utterance of the  Imam. I have no need of (the study of) rijal." He would say, "I owe  my certitude to the Imam. If my statements are free of error, it is to  the extent that whatever I have established in my books is owed to  their teachings. They are themselves free of error, lapse and forgetfulness, and everyone who learns from them is certain of being free from  error."? Such statements amounted to an implicit claim of infallibility  for himself and his doctrines on Ahsa'i's part.
Alhsa'i claimed to have direct contact with the Imams (A), and he  would say,"I have heard from al-Imam al-Sadiq  (A) .... " Such claims brought him cheap and easily-earned popularity and fame.
Such claims to certitude, authority and infallibility certainly deeply  impressed many of his Arab and Persian pupils and disciples, but they  also deepened the suspicions of the Shaykh's opponents who, beginning  to see an impostor in him, had neither any respect from the Shaykh's
philosophical learning' nor any patience for his theological and meta-physical ideas, to say nothing of the horqiiliyah, The Shaykh's pre-tensions amounted to an implicit claim to being a mediator (na 'ib)  between the Hidden Imam (A) and the community. That he perceived it as a continuing office and a going concern is affirmed by his designation of Sayyid K~im Rashti, one of his relatively junior pupils, as his successor. Such designation of a successor, although common among Sufis and Isma'llis, is unknown among Shi'i theologians and fuqaha'.
Moreover, the Shaykhi doctrine of al-rukn al-riibi' also points towards  the claims of AJ;tsa'i and Rashti to a special religious authority." Despite  his wide disrepute, he continued to be regarded highly by his disciples after his death.


Introduction

0

The beginning of the 12th/18th century marks the onset of a visible general decline and degeneration almost throughout the Islamic world. The emergence of Wahhabism in Arabian peninsula during the mid 12th/18th century, the emergence of Babism in mid 13th/19th century Iran, the emergence of Qadiyanism in late 13th/19th century India, were no more than indicators of the worsening state of general intellectual and cultural squalor. A half-educated fanatic from the Najd with a misleading interpretation of monotheism declares war against all Muslims in the name of tauheed: A semi literate youth and a calligrapher from Shiraz, unable to write a correct Arabic sentence and even respect- able Persian, claims to be a prophet and even dares to circulate his insipid 'revelations.' A dabbler in Islamic religious books from the Punjab proclaims to be a prophet and the Messiah. Whereas in earlier times such claimants would have been dismissed as lunatics or put behind the prison bars as crooks and impostors, in the 12thl18th and 13th/19th centuries they found not few ardent followers and adherents among the people.
Mirza Husayn 'Ali Nuri (1233-1309/1818-1892), the so-called Baha'u'llah (lit., the glory of God), was a contemporary of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908) of Qaadiyan, India, who also claimed to be the Mahdi and the promised Messiah, although the former went a step further to claim divinity itself and broke all links with Islam, the professed faith of his predecessors, Shaykh Ahmad Ahsa'i, Sayyid Kasim Rashti,  and even Mirza 'Ali Muhammad Shirazi, the so-called Bab.
 
All histories of Baha'ism begin with Shaykh Ahmad Ahsa'i (1166-  1241 or 1242/1753-1825 or 1826) and the present work is no exception. Pages 1-90 give an account of his life, writings and beliefs, as well as of the controversies they caused, which led to his takfir (denunciation as apostate) by the major Shi'i 'ulama' of the time - first by Mulla  Muhammad Taqi Qazwini (Barghani) and then by others, such as Aqa  Sayyid Mahdi (the son of the author of the Riyaq.), Mulla Muhammad  Ja'far Astarabadi, Mulla Aqa Darbandi (the author of Asnir al-shahiidah};  Sharif al-Ulama' Mazandaranl, Sayyid Ibrahim Qazwini (the author of Qawabit al- 'U$ul), Shaykh Muhammad Hasan Najafi (the author of  Jawahir al-kalam), Shaykh Muhammad Husayn (the author of Fusul fi 'ilm al- 'Usul), and other fuqaha', who declared Shaykh Ahmad and his followers as heretics.